Going on from yesterday’s article:

The major television deals had been struck,Β Abramovich and the Sheikh of Manchester City wereΒ bringing new meaning to the word profligacy,Β David Dein had departed and winning things was fast becoming a thing of the past for Arsenal.

In the meantime many of us scrape together our excessive season ticket money, often having to forgo other things, because we want (need) to be at the ground to watch the games, to participate, feel part of it and to hopefully see Wenger once again assemble a team that can win a trophy.

The stadium is magnificent, if slightly corporate, the pitch is immaculate with none of the mud baths that you used to see at grounds many years ago, but the players are mainly mercenaries. Yes, they are mercenaries who will today pledge their love for the club that we also love, only to leave for more money tomorrow.

Some time later will follow a newspaper article, full of recriminations against a manager that spotted them playing at another team, probably in another country, bought them and gave them a chance at Arsenal, while making them millionaires. But, as fans, we don’t get that option do we? We pay through the nose and accept what is dished up. Abramovich isn’t going to ring us and offer us riches to watch Chelsea instead, even though they have plenty of spare seats.

We have come to painfully realise that our loyalty is not shared by the players, even those we naively thought they felt like us about Arsenal. And it is certainly painful. This has resulted in the emotional attachment and by definition, the commitment of many of us being seriously diluted and the money and greed have combined to drive a wedge between the supporters and the players.

I see this as a dangerous thing for Arsenal who might think that the waiting lists for season tickets is their insurance for the future. But will the fans who come after us be as loyal? That can only answered in the fullness of time.

Now Robin seems to want out because Stan Kroenke won’t countenance the level of spending that Robin equates with ambition. He wants world-class players to be signed as he is now a world-class player (for last season anyway). And of course, being such, he requires that the club doesn’t sign players like he was when he first came, but established stars, presumably like they have at Man City.

I do wonder how long a club like Man City would have put up with van Persie if they were faced with the same legal and disciplinary baggage that he bought to Arsenal. Or if a twat like Mancini would have stuck by a player with an injury record like his, when he only needs to go blubbering, cap in hand, to the Sheikh for an expensive (and better?) replacement. But it doesn’t really matter now. Van Persie, like so many before him, has outgrown Arsenal. Now all that is left, barring a humiliating climb-down from him, is the fee we get.

We will still be here next season, some in body, many, many more in spirit, but van Persie will probably be somewhere else, getting paid the sort of money that the press and his agent have told him he is entitled to. He will be presumably, playing with world-class players for a club that shows the ambition that Arsenal can’t match. He will be winning the trophies that Arsenal can’t afford to buy and will pause only to give an interview that heaps more pain on Arsenal fans and exhibits a lack of respect for Arsene Wenger that is epic in its insensitivity.

All for more money of course. World-class players do nothing for nothing. It’s their right you see – as world-class players. All the best wife-beaters, perverts and drunkards say so on the radio and in the press every day.

So, I think the fan’s relationship with the club is constantly evolving, though whether it will ever have the power to change anything would depend on the fans getting together and acting en masse. Red & White Holdings, either through expediency or inclination, seem to recognise the value of having the fans onside, as they mentioned in their recent press release. It is also tempting to suggest that people like Peter Hill-Wood, with his “Let them eat cake” attitude does not feel the need to acknowledge or nurture the fan’s support. In fact I was waiting for his “They’ve never had it so good” shtick, but I do believe we have already had that one.

I have heard many people say that the fans are the club. This is probably true as I see the owners as the financial custodians. But the relationship is a tricky one and to be successful over a long period the two need to work together. The owners need to balance the books while the fans need to balance their expectations with reality. Conflict between the two is rarely productive.

When Ferguson is finally carried feet-first out of Old Trafford, we will watch with interest to see how successful the new manager is, because if things don’t go well it will be that strange, freaky family, the Glazers, who the fans will turn on in greater numbers. Liverpool fans drove Hicks and Gillette screaming from Anfield so John Henry, who seems to have a plan, could take the reins and have a go. Though if part of the grand scheme was to give Dalglish an open cheque book, then that one will certainly need re-thinking. And of course there is our own man-of-mystery, Silent Stan Kroenke.

Who really knows what Stan’s plan is, or if he even has one? Ivan Gazidis seems to me to understand the importance of the fans to the club, but his track record of actually making the signings that we need is hardly convincing is it? I mean, he’s not an operator like DD is he? – despite PHW seemingly trying to erase Dein’s vast contributions to Arsenal’s success from the history books by speaking of him in the most demeaning fashion at every opportunity. If it wasn’t for the presence of Hill-Wood, could Dein come back? Or has too much money flowed under the bridge into various bank accounts or offshore holdings?

One thing is sure. We will be seen to be unreasonable in our demands and will also be the last to know anything.

As Arsenal supporters, we crave a successful team, but there is no distinction in that. I believe that the rise of the billionaire clubs has changed the outlook for many of us. Yes, of course I would ideally like Arsenal to retain those well-run, ethical and responsible values that the club are admired for, but I must admit that I am heartily sick of being pillaged every year by that idiot Mancini and his “I want what he’s got and I want it now” values. We are, by nature and history, a very traditional and well-run, respected, club but, on the other hand, I do acknowledge that we have robbed Man City blind over the past few years. I mean, over Β£40 million for Kolo and Adebayor?

So, are we prepared to throw our values out of the window to be competitive?

Should we take the Oligarch’s billions? Is there any real difference between being owned by Kroenke or Usmanov? Or must everything be sacrificed on the alter of success? It is your ideas that need to be heard on these matters.

What I will say is that my stance has changed over the past few years as I have seen football and Arsenal change and I am toppling over the fence into the “If you can’t beat ’em” camp. I think I can see a future where we maintain a degree of the dignity that Chelsea and Man City have lost, (if they ever had it in the first place), yet still be competitive. At the moment though I can only see this happening under Wenger.

With a new manager, all bets are off and a new set of parameters comes into play. My fear is that we will not be financially flush while Kroenke is still the owner and perhaps his Arsenal future is linked to Wenger’s stewardship and economic prudence. After all, he is a businessman, not a fan (as Usmanov claims to be) and he will always look at the bottom line, before considering us.

It’s an interesting equation and one that is likely to fuel debate among Arsenal supporters for the foreseeable future. What that future actually is will be, in some measure, down to the fans.

To quote an old wartime phrase. “They also serve, who stand and wait”.

That’s us that is!

Written by Adam.