Result….Clearly. Coming in with only a solitary point from the last nine available, at home against a difficult side, but one that we are nevertheless expected to beat, this had to be about three points. As it was, we celebrated our first win in four league matches, but not without some controversy and frustration along the way.

We should have been ahead on 21 minutes, when Diaby played Arshavin in. Our Russian was too close to Brum keeper Foster, who smothered his shot. Just a couple of minutes later, Nasri picked Squillaci out, who headed in off Foster’s hands – but the goal was (correctly, in my opinion) disallowed for offside. Then Clichy shot wastefully wide from inside the box.

Did anybody get the feeling that we were going to pay for this?

By this point, I felt it was coming and it duly arrived shortly past the half hour. Ferguson crossed into the box, Zigic beat Djourou way too easily and headed between the post and Fabianski. We were lucky not concede a second when Johnson and Zigic combined, but this time the latter fired over.

The first flash point arrived a few minutes later, as Dann appeared to clip Chamakh’s trailing leg in the box, and the latter went over for a penalty. I won’t criticize referee Atkinson here, as he had to make the decision in real-time, and I think the player (Chamakh) sold it rather well. When I first saw it, I thought it was a nailed-on penalty; as I saw the replay, I thought hmmm…. I still think contact was made, but I also think Chamakh embellished it – and for that, I am disappointed.

As an Arsenal supporter, I could easily refrain from criticism and say contact was made, but Chamakh’s flop was rather distasteful to me. I will remember this next time we are denied a penalty, and pledge not to argue. Eck and his players were livid, and justifiably so, in my opinion. I am sure many will disagree with me, but I do not like it when we are victimized by these things. In my mind, I cannot have it both ways. Nasri easily tucked the penalty away, and we were level after we probably should have been 2-0 down. Quite naturally, tempers flared, Nasri was booked, presumably for retaliating on Ridgewell, after the latter had fouled him. Chamakh went down from an elbow across his face, but was fine to continue.

I hope Arsene had a real go at the players at the interval, they quite deserved it. It took us just a couple of minutes after the restart to take the lead. Chamakh got free inside the box and fired under Foster into the far corner. We pretty much bossed it after that. Defensively, we were more solid than in the first half, and we looked threatening on numerous occasions. Birmingham huffed and puffed, but did not appear to have the guile to break us down, after going behind.

Nevertheless, they did not give up, and caused us a few anxious moments late in. But we held out for the three points. So the all-important result was secured, but the method was less convincing. I speak of our singular lack of a killer instinct and over-elaboration. Portions of the second half seemed a one-way procession to the Birmingham penalty area, we moved the ball quite well, but once we arrived to the area, we continued moving sideways, and usually lost the ball. I consider this a problem we need to eradicate: if we are going to pass our way to goal, we need to break and move quicker.

There were too many instances where the excellent Diaby led a break towards the Brum area, but had to slow up to wait for support to arrive. This was followed by a series of passes on the edge of the area (or an Arshavin backheel that nobody latched on to), which gave the Brum defenders time to reset, intercept, and clear. When Rosicky came on for Arshavin, he was more direct; he and Nasri took a couple of long-range shots. But for all of our possession, we did not have that many shots on goal. This lack of killer instinct (the β€œmethod” I allude to) is something that will continue to undermine us, until our players learn to be more direct and more take the responsibility of shooting on goal. Foster spilled one late Nasri shot from outside the area, but we had nobody close in to clean up.

Arsene was banging the dirty tackles drum earlier this week. That is all well and good, most of us think that reckless, irresponsible challenges need to be stamped out. So I await his comments on Wilshere’s ugly challenge that saw a deserved red. If he tries to defend that, or even decline to comment, then he directly undermines his own efforts in this area. If he is serious about effecting the cultural change that is needed, then I hope he leads this effort through personal example. Eboue also made a bad challenge (for a yellow – watching his reaction of appealing to the linesman, it seemed he thought he would be off). He does not need to kill our players, but acknowledging our own players transgressions – in no uncertain terms – shows that he wants this eradicated across the board, and in the end will protect our players far more than lying or demurring. He can say something to the effect of: β€œUnfortunately, Wilshere made a very bad challenge late in the match and was deservedly sent off. He is a young player, he must learn from this. As I have criticized rough tackles on my players, I cannot condone when one my players does it to an opponent. Eboue also made a bad challenge earlier in the match. I am disappointed in both players actions, but I expect them both to learn from this”. Wilshere was on the receiving end of some rough treatment, so perhaps he had enough – that in no way excuses the tackle he attempted. A straight red means we now lose him for our next three league fixtures, starting with Man City away. Not at all what we needed; Cesc will hopefully be back for that, but we will still be a bit short without Jack.

Diaby, in particular, was outstanding: he broke Birmingham attacks up in the middle of the pitch and started several of ours. He kept the ball extremely well – perhaps too well on some occasions – and was at the heart of most of our best moves. I am not sure he took a shot on target, but he certainly created plenty of chances for his team-mates. Wilshere also had an excellent creative game, but spoiled it with his sending off. Song was better than the past couple of matches, but still committed too many fouls – Atkinson showed plenty of patience with him. Arshavin was poor, his first team place should be under threat but I am not sure if it is. Fabianski was solid again and looks confident and assured out thereο»Ώ,Β of course, we do not know what will happen when he makes the inevitable mistake that all goalkeepers do (stand up, Edwin Van Der Sar) – we can only hope that he will be able to shake it off this time. I also ο»Ώο»Ώthought Djourou could have done better for the goal.

I was pleased to see Nick Bendtner get a run-out. He got involved and nearly got a goal in his first minute, but Foster beat him to a loose ball. From the hour mark onwards, I was hoping Arsene would bring both Bendtner and Theo on, but as we did not get a third goal, I fully understand Arsene’s not wanting to bring two players needing match fitness on together.

Arsene has stated that Wilshere deserved to be sent off. Yes, he did and thanks for not trying to insist otherwise. I may characterize the tackle as with β€œexcessive force” rather than ”mistimed”, but I accept that Jack was not trying to hurt the player. Still, he deserved to go, and I am happy that Arsene did not try to suggest otherwise.

A quick word on Birmingham City – Eck looked pretty pissed off at the end, and I can understand why. Arsenal may well have won the game anyways, but Chamakh sold minimal contact and that moment clearly changed the game. Despite all our possession, if Brum had found an equalizer, I would not have begrudged them. They defended well and caused us problems, and looked much, much better than the side that allowed Everton to turn them over right before the international break. The much-maligned Ben Foster had a good game in their goal. If they continue to play like this, they will get that elusive league road win sooner rather than later.

I was absolutely appalled by Trevor Francis’ biased, borderline xenophobic commentary. I assume that UK viewers had to put up with him as well; it has been a long, long time since I heard such nasty, vindictive, overly biased commentary. He was a flat-out disgrace: he kept banging on about cheating Arsenal, blithely glossed over Johnson’s elbow in Chamakh’s face and Bowyer’s nasty challenge on Wilshere, and suggested that the winning goal was Atkinson’s fault because Carr was β€œworried about a penalty” if he committed to challenging Chamakh. I get that he is a former Brum player and manager, but he is well compensated to provide objective match commentary. He failed spectacularly today, and perhaps should no longer work games involving Birmingham City in the future. His pro-Birmingham City bias – some would also say an element of anti-Arsenal/anti-foreigner – was clear for all to hear and ruined the telecast.

Bottom line? A needed three points – but we must do better, we shan’t always come away with points playing like this.

Written by Oliver

I just want to add a comment about Jacks horrid tackle, yes it was bad and he got what he deserved but what about the studs up stamp on Chamakh in the first half by Carr? Didn’t hear old exΒ Brummie Francis say too much about that one did we??