Great news came out of the club yesterday that Jack Wilshere signed a new ‘long term’ contract. Yes, we all knew he probably would but it’s good when its official, all we need now is for Szczesny to follow in his footsteps.

Last week, K-TR7 highlighted an excellent article about the psychology within football and especially at Arsenal. The man with that task is Jacques Crevoisier – he is the brains behind Arsene Wenger’s youth revolution.

Crevoisier and Wenger have known each other for over 40 years and the latter trusts Crevoisier to ‘delve into the minds’ of our up and coming players to see if they have what it takes to make in the big league of football. It will cause little surprise to find out that Jack Wilshere comes out well in the tests he asked to undergo, as did Henry, Anelka, Trezeguet in their younger days and latterly, Theo Walcott and Aaron Ramsey.

Arsene Wenger always tells me that you have to be clever to play for Arsenal and that is where he starts, without that, you cannot fit into his system. At Arsenal I’ve done tests for all the young players. They were all outstanding psychologically. I think Wilshere’s showed him to be a bit more confident than Walcott but they all had some of the best profiles you will see.

The test that these players take involves answering 117 questions and from their answers Crevoisier is able to deduce their strengths and weaknesses something which helps Arsene Wenger judge his players.

The test measures their psychological endurance, competitiveness, emotional control, stress resistance and aggression among other things.

The player has to answer questions like:-

‘Even in training, I want to show I am better than the others’ and ‘I am ready to hurt my adversary in order to win’.

There is no yes or no answer, it’s a case of how strong the player agrees or disagrees with the statement when applying it to themself.

Crevoisier has worked across Europe, especially in France and when he compares the French players with the English, he says that the results are ‘alarming’

Young English players come across as more committed and aggressive in the test but their self-confidence and concentration is not as good, the lack of self-confidence is understandable because it is so difficult to get a chance to break through.

If you are at an average-sized club in France you will get the opportunity to play. At the same size club in England, you have, say, a 28-year-old international with lots of caps in front of you and the chance is not there. Young players in France feel they have a better chance of getting a professional contract.

However, that cannot be said about things at Arsenal – Wengers youth policy pays to that and that policy is partly thanks to Crevoisier and his philosophy

Crevoisier began his psychometric testing when working with French Olympic hopefuls before Gerard Houllier recruited him to work with the French FA.

I was a player-coach at 25 when I started studying for a PhD in psychology. I developed the test and used it on everyone from the Under 15s to the Under 21s. Coaches were happy with the football side and tactics, they understood the physical and fitness side of the game but they weren’t sure about psychology and motivation.

English players come across as more committed and aggressive in the test but their self-confidence and concentration is not as good’ There were good players who weren’t performing properly and nobody could work out why. We wanted to assess their personalities, see the weaknesses and correct what we could. So I came in with this test and we ended up changing 50 per cent of the Under 18 team.

The test is like taking a picture but if I take a picture of you in the summer and then one in the winter, you will have a different face. I discuss the results with the coach to make sure it is a true reflection of what they see daily. ‘If we find the same problems, we can try to fix them. For example, if a player has a concentration problem, is no good just saying ‘Concentrate’. So you give them an exercise to hit sharp passes along the ground, no mistakes allowed, and they have to concentrate.

With 14-year-olds you ask them to do it for a minute, 18-year-olds maybe two. If you do that three times a week, you will notice the difference. I remember Steven Gerrard doing that exercise and I have never seen anyone do it as well in my life. In the early 1990s he was testing what was to become France’s golden generation. ‘Thierry Henry and Mikael Silvestre are probably the two best profiles I have ever seen and their tests were brilliant at 16.


I have tests for Henry, Silvestre, Nicolas Anelka, David Trezeguet and Willy Sagnol at 16, 18 and 20 and they were all excellent. When Anelka was 15, he was a little bit of a difficult personality but he had incredible self-confidence for someone of his age.

Not all of the clubs he has worked for though have been without frustration as Crevoisier explains:-

I worked for Tottenham’s academy for two years when Damien Comolli was there, I have a 10-minute rule, which means players practise a weakness at the end of training for 10 minutes. The results are brilliant.

I remember giving the young players at Tottenham their tasks and they would do them at the end of training. The problem was that the players were not given a chance in the first team – they still aren’t. What is the point of having an academy if you don’t use those players?

Crevoisier wants to work with more clubs in England but he finds it difficult to convince managers to believe in his work. I’m not surprised, most of them are old dinosaurs and as the saying goes ‘you can’t teach an old dog new tricks’

Just imagine Fat Sam introducing this at Blackburn, or Tony Pulis at Stoke, nah, the only question they need to answer is do their players strongly agree or disagree with ‘ I WILL get the player if I can’t get the ball’!!

Of course, we all know the answer to that don’t we?